Revised floral formulae and inflorescence terms
Research into the structure and development of flowers and inflorescences has revealed that traditional descriptive methods are often inadequate. Scientists at Kew have therefore suggested revisions to floral formulae and inflorescence terminology.
06 Jan 2011
Cypripedium calceolus; a complex orchid flower, its diagram and its new floral formula (Image: G. Prenner)
New formula for flowers
The floral formula is a traditional method of efficiently summarising the structure of a flower in text using only letters, numbers and symbols. In a review in Taxon, Gerhard Prenner, Richard Bateman and Paula Rudall (who work in Kew’s Micromorphology Section) update the format and information content of floral formulae.
The new flormulae include the number and symmetry of each whorl of floral organs, position of the organs relative to each other, partial and/or complete fusion of organs, resupination, organ loss and suppression, and deviations from standard bisexuality. The authors use several complex flowers to illustrate their view that formulae of all known flower morphs can be accurately represented using standard typeface and Unicode character codes.
It is recommend that floral formulae become a routine component of diagnoses in protologues and other formal taxonomic (re)descriptions, functioning as a logical phenotypic counterpart to the DNA barcode.
Standardised inflorescence terminology
The iterative structure of inflorescences makes them suitable subjects for constructing models to account for morphological variation. However, the terminology surrounding inflorescence architecture suffers from radically divergent definitions of terms that reduce the value of some recent predictive models.
In an ‘Opinion’ paper in Trends in Plant Science, Gerhard Prenner and Paula Rudall, working with Francisco Vergara-Silva (UNAM Mexico), stress the key role of morphology in modelling inflorescence architecture. They argue in favour of uniform terminology and against over-simplification.
Recognising the value of bracts and prophylls as key markers of inflorescence architecture, their preferred terminology gives the main inflorescence types as cymose, racemose, paniculate and thyrsoid, although problematic ‘special cases’ such as highly reduced flowerlike inflorescences (pseudanthia) defy assignment to particular types.
Item from Dr Gerhard Prenner (Senior Researcher in Morphology/Anatomy, RBG Kew)
Originally published in Kew Scientist, issues 36 & 37
Prenner, G., Bateman, R.M. & Rudall, P.J. (2010). Floral formulae updated for routine inclusion in formal taxonomic descriptions. Taxon 59: 241-250.
Prenner, G., Vergara-Silva, F. & Rudall, P.J. (2009). The key role of morphology in modelling inflorescence architecture. Trends in Plant Science 14: 302-309.
Scientific Research & Data
- Kew's research on floral evolution
- Evolution of flowers and inflorescences in Euphorbiaceae
- Floral evolution in Lamiales
Help Kew break new ground and inspire new generations
By making a donation to Kew today you can help our scientists to find out more about the fascinating world of plants, break new ground and inspire generations of young people to get to know plants better.
Our scientific programmes are focused on understanding plants and conserving the world's plant life and habitats at risk. Plants are essential to life on earth. In a world where the sustainability of the planet’s rich biodiversity is becoming less certain, Kew’s science work is ever more critical. Find out how your donation can make a difference.
Browse Kew news
- In the Gardens
- Science and conservation
- How you are helping
- Specialist science
- Kew blogs
- All Kew news
Keep up to date with events and news from Kew
Kew on twitter
Unable to parse the data in the RSS file.